Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 76.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2017-04-28 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.72 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2457 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3350mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 6, having an 80.1 score against 76.5. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a extremely newer phone than the Xiaomi Mi 6, although it's much thicker and extremely heavier. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has more memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 6, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi 6 features a processing unit that is very similar to Galaxy XCover FieldPro's processing unit, and although the Xiaomi Mi 6 has a greater amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi 6 shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller sensor giving a worse image quality and a tinier camera aperture which is worse for taking images in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same resolution camera, the Xiaomi Mi 6 also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features longer battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 6, because it has a 34% larger battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Xiaomi Mi 6, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Mi 6. If you are trying to save some money, you can buy the Xiaomi Mi 6, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.