Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-06-05 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.10 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Gold and White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2248 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 56.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 8 has a global score of 83.3, which is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 8 has 10 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xiaomi Mi 8 is an older cellphone than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it is way lighter and noticeably thinner anyway.
The Xiaomi Mi 8 has a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi 8 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Mi 8, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi 8 counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not good for low-light images, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera and a 0.39 inches sensor, the Xiaomi Mi 8 also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Xiaomi Mi 8 has a better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 8, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.