Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-04 | -- |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.16 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3350mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is a bit better than Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite's 77.7 overall score. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is notably thicker and a lot heavier than the Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite has Android 8.1 Oreo.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more powerful CPU than Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a greater display pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite features a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, and they both have a back camera with a 12 MP resolution and the same back camera sensor size, the Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi 8 Lite, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.