Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-03-06 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.10 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Purple |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9 has a score of 83.2, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Although Xiaomi Mi 9 is older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's body is noticeably lighter and extremely thinner. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi 9, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher display pixel density.
Xiaomi Mi 9 features a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Mi 9 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi 9 shoots greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way more mega pixels camera in the back, a way bigger sensor and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features greater battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9, because it has a 36 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.