Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a global score of 81.4, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Even though Xiaomi Mi 9 SE is older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's body is extremely lighter and much thinner.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel number per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking images or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a way more MP camera, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way bigger camera sensor shooting way better quality photos and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 47% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.