Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Plastic | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi 9T is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 82.2 score against 80.1. Even though Xiaomi Mi 9T is older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's body is much thinner and incredibly lighter. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Xiaomi Mi 9T has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Mi 9T, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a greater storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better battery performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Mi 9T takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for shooting photos or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a lot more megapixels camera in the back, a way bigger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a much higher video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.