Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-08-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black | Carbon black, Glacier blue and Red flame |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a global score of 82.7 against 80.1. These phones come with Android OS, but Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro has the previous 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were only released with a few months difference, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro is extremely thinner and extremely lighter.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro also has 2 GB more RAM. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better screen than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little longer battery life than Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Xiaomi Mi 9T Pro shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light captures, it also counts with a much larger sensor which offers a much better image and video quality, a much more mega-pixels camera in the back and a much better (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.