Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-07-27 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.25 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Gold, Pink and Red |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3010mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Mi A2's global score of 78. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is newer than the Xiaomi Mi A2's, although it's incredibly heavier and noticeably thicker. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better display than Xiaomi Mi A2, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Mi A2, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has more storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi A2, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The Xiaomi Mi A2 shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing worse quality videos and pictures and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for capturing images or videos in low light situations, and they both have a 12 megapixels back facing camera, the Xiaomi Mi A2 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a very superior battery performance than Xiaomi Mi A2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.