Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-07-24 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.04 x 2.83 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.13 ounces |
| Black | Blue, Gray and White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4030mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi A3, getting a overall score of 80.1 against 79.2. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than the Xiaomi Mi A3, we must note that it is also way thicker and heavier. Both devices in this review come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Mi A3 has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features an incredibly better screen than Xiaomi Mi A3, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much better screen density and a lot better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Xiaomi Mi A3 features a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi Mi A3. They have 8 processing cores and 4 GB of RAM. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi A3, because it has a 12% larger battery size. The Xiaomi Mi A3 shoots way better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, a bigger sensor providing a higher image quality and a much higher resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.