Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2016-05-17 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.81 x 3.48 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 344 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8956 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4850mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Max's 77.5 score. Although the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is way newer than the Xiaomi Mi Max, it is much heavier and notably thicker. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a brighter display than Xiaomi Mi Max, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a much better screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi Max. Both of them have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. Xiaomi Mi Max has more memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an external SD slot that supports up to 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with more internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi Max features just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4850mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Xiaomi Mi Max counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos or videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution and a camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.