Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-04-03 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.94 x 2.95 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 639.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s has a general score of 83.8, which is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s's body is extremely thinner and incredibly lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though it was released 2 years before. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s counts with a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features improved battery life than Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s shoots a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back and the same camera sensor size, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s also counts with a lot higher video resolution.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 2s is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.