Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Green |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a global score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. Although the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 is older than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bit better processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, and they both have a 0.39 inches sensor, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also counts with a more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way higher video resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a really longer battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has a 41% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.