Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-08-10 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black | Ceramic Black, Ceramic White and Shadow Gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (480 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting an 89 score against 80.1. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 is a newer phone, and it's also somewhat lighter and thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel count in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a better memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Mix 4, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 has a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a lot larger back camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and pictures and a lot more MP back-facing camera.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 4 counts with a battery duration that is just as good as Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.