Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 84.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2024-07-19 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.28 x 5.64 x 0.18 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2488 x 2224 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 417 pixels per inch |
| -- | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 84.3 score against 80.1. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has 14 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 is a newer device, and it's also somewhat lighter and thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much lower pixel amount per inch in the screen, it also counts with a way larger display and a higher resolution of 2224 x 2488px. Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a quite bigger storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features an extremely better processing unit than Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 CPU cores. The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot higher video definition, a lot higher resolution back camera and a way bigger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix Fold 4 features just a little bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 13% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.