Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-11-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.21 x 2.92 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Aurora green, Glacier white and Midnight black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 377.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 13.09 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5260mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has a general score of 83.7, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. Even though the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released only 5 months apart, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner. These phones include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Mi Note 10 has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Xiaomi Mi Note 10 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video quality, a much higher resolution back facing camera and a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 10, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Mi Note 10 features greater battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5260mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, the Xiaomi Mi Note 10 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.