Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-04-04 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Black and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, with an 80.1 score against 76. Even though Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is way newer than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, it's way thicker and extremely heavier. Both phones in this review work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version, so it provides some extra features.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of screen. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a greater number of cores.
The Xiaomi Mi Note 2 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier sensor and a much smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light images, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a way more megapixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has more storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Mi Note 2. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Mi Note 2, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.