Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-03-13 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has an overall score of 80.5, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 overall score. Even though the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro is older than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, it's body is noticeably lighter and much thinner. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Xiaomi Note 7 Pro has 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo, giving a lot of extra features and improved performance.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a greater memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Xiaomi Note 7 Pro shoots way better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light images, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels camera, a much larger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a lot better video quality.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little longer battery duration than Xiaomi Note 7 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.