Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a general score of 87.9 against 80.1. These phones include Android operating system, but Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has an older 10 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro design is much thinner and lighter than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though both of them were released only a few months apart.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much better resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.