Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-03-27 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Black | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a global score of 87.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 overall score. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS (Operating System), but Xiaomi Poco F3 has older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. Xiaomi Poco F3's body is newer, much lighter and noticeably thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F3 has just a bit better screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much worse display density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a really larger screen.
The Xiaomi Poco F3 has a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photography, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega-pixels resolution, a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F3, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco F3 features a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4520mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.