Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2022-06-23 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.43 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black | Moonlight Silver, Nebula Green and Night Black |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F4 is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a general score of 87.5 against 80.1. Xiaomi Poco F4 is a noticeably newer phone, and it is also a lot thinner and notably lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These devices come with Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco F4 has the older 12 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Xiaomi Poco F4 has a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco F4 also has a greater amount of RAM. Xiaomi Poco F4 counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a lot lower pixel density, it also counts with a way bigger display.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a quite bigger storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F4, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Poco F4's battery lifetime is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro one.
Xiaomi Poco F4 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way larger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures and videos, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.