Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's 78.7 score. Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, we must note that it is also heavier and notably thicker. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10, providing you some extra features.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little better performance than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better display than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro feature incredibly similar storage to install applications and games, they have a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11% more battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro takes way better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.