Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is slightly better than the Xiaomi Poco M3's 78.2 score. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Poco M3 has Android 10, providing you some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an a lot thicker and noticeably heavier phone than Xiaomi Poco M3.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a better display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher amount of pixels per inch of display. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Poco M3. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Xiaomi Poco M3 and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro have really similar memory to install games and applications, both have equal internal memory and an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco M3 features improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 33 percent greater battery capacity.
Xiaomi Poco M3 shoots way better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and video in low light environments, and they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a much larger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a much better resolution camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Xiaomi Poco M3. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Xiaomi Poco M3, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.