Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-05-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black | Cool Blue, POCO Yellow and Power Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G has a score of 80.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 general score. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G has an older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G is a newer device, and it is also a lot lighter and a lot thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better looking screen than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher screen density. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has much more storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better processing power than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G. They have the same RAM memory amount and the same number of cores. The Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G captures a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G also counts with a much larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality and a much better 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.