Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than Xiaomi Poco X2, getting an 80.1 score against 79.3. Despite being the best phone we are comparing here, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a heavier and extremely thicker phone than the Xiaomi Poco X2. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Poco X2 has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Poco X2, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a higher number of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Poco X2 and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro both feature incredibly similar battery durations.
Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images, it also counts with a way higher resolution camera, a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.