Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a global score of 81.6 against 80.1. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's body is lighter and incredibly thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though both of them were released with only a couple months difference. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has older 10 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little sharper screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels count in each inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features slightly more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photos in low light situations, it also counts with a lot more MP camera in the back, a lot better (4K) video resolution and a much larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.