Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a global score of 83.4 against 80.1. These phones work with Android OS, but Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro is a newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat lighter and much thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a slightly better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures or videos in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a way bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro counts with a very superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.