Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 general score. Although it's the best phone we compare here, it must be noted that it is also older, a lot thicker and extremely heavier. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher screen pixel density. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Redmi 9T. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi 9T takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light photography, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much larger sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro and the Xiaomi Redmi 9T feature really similar memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and equal 64 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Redmi 9T has superior battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.