Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's 78.3 global score. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is an older, noticeably heavier and thicker cellphone than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. Both devices we are comparing here use Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 4 GB RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot lower pixel number per display inch and a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bigger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has as much memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos as the Galaxy XCover FieldPro one, they have a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and the same 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has just a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and give up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.