Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-03-24 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.46 x 3.01 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Glacier Blue, Gradient Bronze and Onyx Gray |
| Plastic | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 82.4 score against 80.1. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro has 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro is a newer phone, and it is also way lighter and thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot worse pixels count per screen inch and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger screen.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro and Galaxy XCover FieldPro both count with extremely similar storage capacity for games and applications, both of them have a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB and the same internal storage. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro features a bit superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 12 percent bigger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 Pro not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.