Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | -- |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with a global score of 80.1 against 77.1. Even being the best in this review, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a extremely thicker and much heavier device than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11 version, offering a couple additional features and enhanced performance.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a way bigger screen and a slightly higher 2080 x 2400 pixels resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier aperture, it also counts with a way better 108 MP resolution camera in the back and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.