Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 75.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black | Frosted Blue, Onyx Black, Stardust Purple and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, having a overall score of 80.1 against 75.7. Even being the best in this comparison review, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is older, noticeably thicker and noticeably heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has Android 12.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a very superior processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher pixel amount per inch in the display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels, a lot bigger back camera sensor which gives a lot higher photo and video quality and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.