Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's score of 77.2. Even though the Galaxy XCover FieldPro is newer than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, it is heavier and thicker. These phones use Android OS, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the older 8.0 Oreo version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing images in poorly lited environments, they both have the same video frame rates, the same video definition, the same back-facing camera sensor size and a back camera with a 12 mega-pixels resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 13% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.