Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a global score of 80.3 against 80.1. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 is an older cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it is way lighter and much thinner anyway. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB against 512 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. They have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 shoots way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera and a way larger camera sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little better battery performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.