Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a global score of 81.1 against 80.1. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a incredibly thinner and lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both were only released with a few months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro count with extremely similar memory for games and applications, they have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 12% larger battery size.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier aperture, it also counts with a way better video resolution, a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting much better quality photos and a lot higher resolution camera.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro not only is the best phones in our comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.