Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a score of 83, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 overall score. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is a newer device, and it is also extremely thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T. Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features as much memory capacity for applications and games as the Galaxy XCover FieldPro one, they have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photographs, a much more mega pixels back facing camera and a much better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.