Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's general score of 78.1. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better phone than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, we must tell that it is also an older, way heavier and way thicker phone. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has Android 11 version.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater pixel density.
ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs in low-light environments, it also counts with a way better video quality and a camera with a way higher 64 MP resolution. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.