Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 14.x |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.18 x 2.53 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 4.76 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Green, Purple, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 477 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit, 5 nm (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 mini has a score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 score. IPhone 12 mini's body is newer, extremely lighter and noticeably thinner than the Galaxy XCover Pro. The iPhone 12 mini has iOS 14.x OS, while Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 OS. IPhone 12 mini has a better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone 12 mini also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
Apple iPhone 12 mini counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Apple iPhone 12 mini also counts with a bit better pixel density. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone 12 mini, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The Apple iPhone 12 mini features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back camera with much less MP, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and videos and a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition. Galaxy XCover Pro has a way better battery life than Apple iPhone 12 mini, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity instead of 2227mAh.
Apple iPhone 12 mini costs a lot more money than the Galaxy XCover Pro, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.