Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having a 92.8 score against 81. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro has iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro comes with Android 11 OS. The Apple iPhone 12 Pro is a somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although both of them were only released 9 months apart.
IPhone 12 Pro counts with a quite superior performance than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit CPU and more RAM. IPhone 12 Pro counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a little higher resolution of 1170 x 2532px.
IPhone 12 Pro has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution and a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light environments. The Galaxy XCover Pro features more storage to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro features a superior battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has a 44% larger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.