Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-11-13 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 8.03 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1100.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3687mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 12 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is much better than Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 score. The iPhone 12 Pro Max is a newer and a lot thinner phone than Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's also just a little bit heavier. IPhone 12 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Galaxy XCover Pro counts with Android 11 operating system.
IPhone 12 Pro Max counts with a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has lesser CPU cores , it also counts with 2 GB more RAM and a 64-bits processing unit. The iPhone 12 Pro Max has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a bit larger screen, a bit more pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back camera with lot less mega pixels, it also counts with a larger camera aperture and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little better battery lifetime than iPhone 12 Pro Max, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although iPhone 12 Pro Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.