Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black | Blue, Midnight, Pink, Red and Starlight |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 799.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3227mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 has a general score of 91.5, which is better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's general score of 81. The iPhone 13 works with iOS 15.x OS, while Galaxy XCover Pro counts with Android 11 OS. The iPhone 13 construction is newer, much thinner and lighter than Galaxy XCover Pro. IPhone 13 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater display pixel density and a little higher 1170 x 2532 resolution.
IPhone 13 has a better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster), and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone 13 also counts with a 64-bit processor. Apple iPhone 13 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better photography in poorly lited environments and a way better (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a bigger memory to store more apps and games than iPhone 13, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with greater battery duration than iPhone 13, because it has a 4050mAh battery size.
The iPhone 13 is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.