Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro's general score of 81. The iPhone 13 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro comes with Android 11 operating system. The iPhone 13 Pro is a newer device, and it is also a bit lighter and much thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
The iPhone 13 Pro features a better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1170 x 2532 resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has less cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU and a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy XCover Pro features superior battery duration than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lot less mega pixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger aperture.
Although iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.