Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 93.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-01-31 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2778 x 1284 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with a general score of 93.2 against 81. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a newer and thinner device than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although it's also a little heavier. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x OS, while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 OS.
IPhone 13 Pro Max has a more powerful CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a 64-bits processing unit. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has a little sharper screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a higher resolution of 1284 x 2778 pixels, a bit bigger display and a just a bit greater number of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy XCover Pro features a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a little longer battery duration than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a way lower 12 MP resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography and videos in low light situations and a much better 3840x2160 video quality.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, else you can save some money and get the Galaxy XCover Pro, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.