Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-01-31 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro has a global score of 95.6, which is better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 global score. IPhone 14 Pro's body is newer, a lot thinner and a bit lighter than the Galaxy XCover Pro. IPhone 14 Pro comes with iOS 16.x operating system, while Galaxy XCover Pro counts with Android 11 operating system.
The iPhone 14 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater screen density and a bit higher resolution of 1179 x 2556px. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a greater storage capacity to install applications and games than iPhone 14 Pro, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
IPhone 14 Pro features a greater performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit and a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover Pro has better battery life than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
The iPhone 14 Pro shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures in low light situations, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a camera with lot more megapixels.
The iPhone 14 Pro is a lot more expensive than Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.