Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 94.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-01-31 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2796 x 1290 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 460 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4323mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, having a 94.9 score against 81. The iPhone 14 Pro Max comes with iOS 16.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11 operating system. IPhone 14 Pro Max's design is notably newer and notably thinner, but a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a more powerful processor than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has lesser CPU cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a 64-bits CPU. IPhone 14 Pro Max features just a bit better display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a quite bigger screen, a better 1290 x 2796px resolution and a just a bit greater pixels amount in each inch of screen.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a 7 percent more battery capacity.
The iPhone 14 Pro Max shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a lot more MP camera and a way better (4K) video definition.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.