Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 4.87 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 3.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone 7 has a score of 81.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro's 81 overall score. The iPhone 7 is an noticeably older cellphone than Galaxy XCover Pro, but it's way lighter and incredibly thinner anyway. IPhone 7 has a screen that's very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, although the iPhone 7 has a lot smaller screen, a way lower 750 x 1334 resolution and a just a bit worse pixels count in each display inch.
Galaxy XCover Pro features a bit more powerful processing unit than Apple iPhone 7, because it has 4 more CPU cores (although slower) and 2 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy XCover Pro captures clearer photos and videos than iPhone 7, because although it has a much smaller sensor taking much lower quality photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a bigger aperture and a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Apple iPhone 7 features a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Apple iPhone 7, because it has a 107% greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 7 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, giving up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.