Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-01-31 | 2020-04-24 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Black, Red and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with an 81.5 score against 81. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) is a a lot thinner and extremely lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even when they were only released 3 months apart. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) comes with iOS 15.x operating system, and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with Android 11 operating system.
IPhone SE (2020) features a greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor. Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a lot smaller screen, a way worse resolution of 750 x 1334 pixels and a just a bit lower number of pixels per inch of screen.
Apple iPhone SE (2020) shoots clearer videos and photos than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and a lot worse resolution back camera, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a much bigger camera sensor. Galaxy XCover Pro has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a much longer battery life than Apple iPhone SE (2020), because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 1821mAh.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, iPhone SE (2020) is also cheap compared to the Galaxy XCover Pro, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.