Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone X is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, having a score of 88.1 against 81. Even though iPhone X is much older than the Galaxy XCover Pro, it's design is lighter and extremely thinner. IPhone X has a little more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels in each screen inch and a quite better resolution of 1125 x 2436.
IPhone X has a better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory. IPhone X counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory and 2 lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone X captures a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low light photography and videos and a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video definition and a lot bigger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 49% greater battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone X, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.