Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 409 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XR is a bit better than the Galaxy XCover Pro, having an 82 score against 81. The Apple iPhone XR body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy XCover Pro, even though it was released just 15 months before. The Apple iPhone XR features a more powerful processor than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and less cpu cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
IPhone XR has a slightly better screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a bit lower pixels density, a little smaller display and a way worse 828 x 1792px resolution. Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a very superior storage for games and applications than iPhone XR, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a superior battery performance than iPhone XR, because it has a 38 percent larger battery capacity. The iPhone XR has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a lot lower resolution back facing camera and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for capturing photos and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much higher video definition and a way bigger sensor.
Although Apple iPhone XR is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone XR, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.