Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.27 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is a bit better than Galaxy XCover Pro, with an 84.2 score against 81. Despite of the fact that iPhone XS is older than Galaxy XCover Pro, it's construction is somewhat lighter and noticeably thinner. Apple iPhone XS counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density and a slightly better 1125 x 2436 pixels resolution.
Apple iPhone XS counts with a faster CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores , and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Apple iPhone XS has a slightly better camera than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture and a back camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video quality and a lot bigger sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a much greater memory to store more games and applications than iPhone XS, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Galaxy XCover Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy XCover Pro has a way better battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.