Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-31 | 2018-10-29 |
| 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches | 6.25 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 421.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 409 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 3.63 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover Pro is a little bit better than Asus ROG Phone, with a general score of 81 against 77.1. Although Galaxy XCover Pro is newer than Asus ROG Phone, it's thicker and a bit heavier. The Asus ROG Phone counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy XCover Pro, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a bit less pixels per inch of display.
The Asus ROG Phone counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Asus ROG Phone also has more RAM memory. The Asus ROG Phone features a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a very superior camera than Asus ROG Phone, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rate and a lot smaller sensor which provides a lot worse image and video quality, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with just a little better battery performance than Asus ROG Phone, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy XCover Pro is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.